{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Reiterer &amp; Marangoni","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.reiterer-marangoni.it\/it\/","author_name":"reiterermarangoni","author_url":"https:\/\/www.reiterer-marangoni.it","title":"La reviviscenza della clausola risolutiva espressa - Reiterer &amp; Marangoni","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HmcBTFdt6k\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reiterer-marangoni.it\/it\/news\/la-reviviscenza-della-clausola-risolutiva-espressa\/\">La reviviscenza della clausola risolutiva espressa<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reiterer-marangoni.it\/it\/news\/la-reviviscenza-della-clausola-risolutiva-espressa\/embed\/#?secret=HmcBTFdt6k\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;La reviviscenza della clausola risolutiva espressa&#8221; &#8212; Reiterer &amp; Marangoni\" data-secret=\"HmcBTFdt6k\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Con la sentenza n. 18991 del 27.09.2016, la Suprema Corte, chiamata ad esprimersi in ordine alle censure mosse alla sentenza della Corte d\u2019Appello territoriale da parte del conduttore di un immobile, secondo il quale quest\u2019ultima non avrebbe considerato, per escludere la gravit\u00e0 dell\u2019inadempimento, la condotta [&hellip;]"}